: As of February 2018, the case was noted for its slow progress (often described as "dragging on") in the Chengalpattu Mahila Court, with delays attributed to the absence of defense counsel and slow cross-examination of witnesses.
The first camp, comprising traditionalists and some priestly associations, argued that the video was deceptively cropped or deliberately shot from an angle that misrepresented a legitimate ritual act. They claimed that a non-initiated person cannot understand the esoteric symbolism of priestly actions. Furthermore, they alleged a conspiracy—a "Hinduphobic" or atheistic agenda aimed at defaming Sanatana Dharma. For this group, sharing the video was itself a sin ( adharma ), a violation of the sanctity of the temple space. Their argument rested on the premise that priests are answerable only to the deity and the shastras , not to a mobile-wielding public. kanchipuram priest devanathan mms scandal free
If you believe this event has been reported by a legitimate news source, please provide the link or the correct spelling of the name. Otherwise, I recommend: : As of February 2018, the case was
Note: If you are writing this for a specific academic requirement, ensure you verify the specific date and outcome of the Devanathan incident (e.g., was he suspended? did he apologize?) to ensure factual accuracy, as social media narratives often evolve rapidly. If you believe this event has been reported
After extensive cross-verification with Tamil Nadu police records, leading news outlets (The Hindu, Times of India, BBC Tamil, News18), and official statements from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department,